<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Panda&#8217;s Cloud Antivirus #1&#8230;according to PC World</title> <atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/</link> <description>Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To&#039;s</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Gary</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-5810</link> <dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:07:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-5810</guid> <description>First, those who claim Panda Cloud to be a resource hog I&#039;m not sure where you are getting this.  I have a 2004 Gateway notebook with a much slower cpu and limited memory in comparison with computers today and Panda Cloud is by far the lightest on resources of the AV&#039;s I have used which include ESET, Norton, Trend Micro, Kaspersky.  More recently I installed Avira which was easy on resources but still not as good as Panda Cloud.  My question is did you really download Panda Cloud or one of Panda&#039;s conventional AV&#039;s?  Even scans are light on resources.  As far as Prevex goes, Prevx sucks.  They offer no full trial version.  Just a version that detects only.  A friend paid for Prevx and discovered when it came to malware removal it was terrible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, those who claim Panda Cloud to be a resource hog I&#8217;m not sure where you are getting this.  I have a 2004 Gateway notebook with a much slower cpu and limited memory in comparison with computers today and Panda Cloud is by far the lightest on resources of the AV&#8217;s I have used which include ESET, Norton, Trend Micro, Kaspersky.  More recently I installed Avira which was easy on resources but still not as good as Panda Cloud.  My question is did you really download Panda Cloud or one of Panda&#8217;s conventional AV&#8217;s?  Even scans are light on resources.  As far as Prevex goes, Prevx sucks.  They offer no full trial version.  Just a version that detects only.  A friend paid for Prevx and discovered when it came to malware removal it was terrible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hamami</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4297</link> <dc:creator>Hamami</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:18:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4297</guid> <description>hunkkkkyuber@yahoo.comYou have absoluetly right? ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="mailto:hunkkkkyuber@yahoo.com">hunkkkkyuber@yahoo.com</a></p><p>You have absoluetly right? <img
src='http://remove-malware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hunkkkkyuber@yahoo.com</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4294</link> <dc:creator>hunkkkkyuber@yahoo.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:17:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4294</guid> <description>You want me to believe that the likes of Kaspersky, Nod32, and Norton scored lower than Comodo: at 74.6% ? there is now way they scored lower than 74.6%...me thinks this article is bullsh*t</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want me to believe that the likes of Kaspersky, Nod32, and Norton scored lower than Comodo: at 74.6% ? there is now way they scored lower than 74.6%&#8230;me thinks this article is bullsh*t</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JJ</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4292</link> <dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:08:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4292</guid> <description>Bill DigiglioOctober 13, 2009 at 1:56 amI am sticking with mse, the few percentage points doesnt make much a difference and next test it might change again. I am not one to change everytime a new test comes out and other tests the results are different.Well, Bill, I am sticking with Avira as I am not one to change every time someone gets excited about something new (MSE)But 2% is a huge difference in this space.  Surely you see that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Digiglio</p><p>October 13, 2009 at 1:56 am</p><p>I am sticking with mse, the few percentage points doesnt make much a difference and next test it might change again. I am not one to change everytime a new test comes out and other tests the results are different.</p><p>Well, Bill, I am sticking with Avira as I am not one to change every time someone gets excited about something new (MSE)</p><p>But 2% is a huge difference in this space.  Surely you see that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LoveSophos</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4291</link> <dc:creator>LoveSophos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:32:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4291</guid> <description>Yes. The Beta3 is quite an improvement! (0.08.83)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. The Beta3 is quite an improvement! (0.08.83)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 123zap</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4290</link> <dc:creator>123zap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:09:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4290</guid> <description>You know what, I just tested panda and it sucked.  I also haven&#039;t trusted PC mag in a while now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what, I just tested panda and it sucked.  I also haven&#8217;t trusted PC mag in a while now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clocks</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4289</link> <dc:creator>Clocks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:39:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4289</guid> <description>Matt - Maybe wait a few days?  A new build is supposed to be out in &quot;days&quot; according to wilders.Have you testing Immunet yet?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; Maybe wait a few days?  A new build is supposed to be out in &#8220;days&#8221; according to wilders.</p><p>Have you testing Immunet yet?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 1oxo1</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4288</link> <dc:creator>1oxo1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:11:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4288</guid> <description>Panda Cloud is no where near better than Prevx.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panda Cloud is no where near better than Prevx.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hamami</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4287</link> <dc:creator>Hamami</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:03:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4287</guid> <description>Which Place took Kaspersky and Norton?
Their signatures must be higher than Comodo, AVG, MSE, Avast, Avira,and Panda too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Place took Kaspersky and Norton?<br
/> Their signatures must be higher than Comodo, AVG, MSE, Avast, Avira,and Panda too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Onur</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-news/pandas-cloud-antivirus-1-according-to-pc-world/#comment-4285</link> <dc:creator>Onur</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:49:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1850#comment-4285</guid> <description>What? xD I couldn’t believe! this 99.4% score.I tried Panda. It&#039;s very slow and system resource monster.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? xD I couldn’t believe! this 99.4% score.</p><p>I tried Panda. It&#8217;s very slow and system resource monster.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 26/34 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 599/605 objects using disk: basic

Served from: remove-malware.com @ 2012-02-11 22:13:23 -->
