Comments on: Comodo Internet Security 3.8 Review – Usability, Detection and Removal http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/ Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To's Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: nobodyhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2341 nobody Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:49:17 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2341 first mistake in testing comes from lying to CIS, when malwarekilla said His PC is clean in installation procedure CIS becomes blind to behaviors of any kind, (d+ turned itself in "training mode" in which remembers all rogue beh. like trusted) after that everything goes wrong...also While testing ESET 4.0, I cant understand why malwarekilla didnt disabled realtime detection while setting up his customized set up, instead we watched all kind of popups and movie was endless painful experience for him and usat the end VIVA to CIS and D+,:) first mistake in testing comes from lying to CIS, when malwarekilla said His PC is clean in installation procedure CIS becomes blind to behaviors of any kind, (d+ turned itself in “training mode” in which remembers all rogue beh. like trusted) after that everything goes wrong…

also While testing ESET 4.0, I cant understand why malwarekilla didnt disabled realtime detection while setting up his customized set up, instead we watched all kind of popups and movie was endless painful experience for him and us

at the end VIVA to CIS and D+,:)

]]> By: RejZoRhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2283 RejZoR Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:56:19 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2283 Yeah, the stuff you manually block and delete in CIS isn't exactly fair if you compare to others. The first reviews you made were made from an user perspective. So what it was detected, it was detected (and hopefully removed). But since you remove half the stuff by hand, it's not really easy to evaluate or compare on or another. But from what i've seen CIS was struggling to clean lots of junk and it missed lots of stuff too. No safe-mode test like before either :( CIS is ok and will get better in v3.9 and 4.x but for now it's really struggling to even detect stuff. Defense+ is simply usless and annoying for average users. Hell, it's annoying even for me and i'm far from novice user. Thats why i'm hopelessly waiting for them to turn Defense+ HIPS into behavior detection system and finally implement true heuristics. Yeah, the stuff you manually block and delete in CIS isn’t exactly fair if you compare to others. The first reviews you made were made from an user perspective. So what it was detected, it was detected (and hopefully removed).
But since you remove half the stuff by hand, it’s not really easy to evaluate or compare on or another. But from what i’ve seen CIS was struggling to clean lots of junk and it missed lots of stuff too. No safe-mode test like before either :(
CIS is ok and will get better in v3.9 and 4.x but for now it’s really struggling to even detect stuff. Defense+ is simply usless and annoying for average users. Hell, it’s annoying even for me and i’m far from novice user.
Thats why i’m hopelessly waiting for them to turn Defense+ HIPS into behavior detection system and finally implement true heuristics.

]]> By: Marcos N. Pesichttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2282 Marcos N. Pesic Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:33:29 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2282 I think you should use ONLY the anti-virus to clean the PC (so we can see what is left) and then do the "manual" stuff with the Defense + tool. You also should have scanned in "Safe Mode".Anyway another good review, (image/sound are awesome for a Youtube video)... Altough I may say that the "Ad-aware" review that follows have a VERY LOW SOUND. In my system I could not hear your voice even with 100% volume. I think you should use ONLY the anti-virus to clean the PC (so we can see what is left) and then do the “manual” stuff with the Defense + tool.
You also should have scanned in “Safe Mode”.

Anyway another good review, (image/sound are awesome for a Youtube video)…
Altough I may say that the “Ad-aware” review that follows have a VERY LOW SOUND. In my system I could not hear your voice even with 100% volume.

]]> By: RejZoRhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2281 RejZoR Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:35:35 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2281 They're not. They are just using either modified packers or very complex packers/protectors like Themida and Armadillo. Each of these are either too complex to dissasemble/unpack or they just fail to unpack because they are modified or custom made. They’re not. They are just using either modified packers or very complex packers/protectors like Themida and Armadillo.
Each of these are either too complex to dissasemble/unpack or they just fail to unpack because they are modified or custom made.

]]> By: fhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2280 f Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:34:24 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2280 What is that supposed to dolike all virsesare all packed differnty What is that supposed to do

like all virsesare all packed differnty

]]> By: RejZoRhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2279 RejZoR Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:07:35 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2279 Packer detection means when something is detected just because it's packed with a specific PE packer. Like MEW or Armadillo (and many others). Packer detection means when something is detected just because it’s packed with a specific PE packer.
Like MEW or Armadillo (and many others).

]]> By: fhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2278 f Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:38:59 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2278 what is packer detection what is packer detection

]]> By: RejZoRhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2277 RejZoR Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:19:51 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2277 It's just packer detection, so it doesn't make much difference. It's still useless to whatever you set it. Until they add actual heuristics... It’s just packer detection, so it doesn’t make much difference. It’s still useless to whatever you set it.
Until they add actual heuristics…

]]> By: malwarekillahttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2276 malwarekilla Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:04:57 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2276 Yup, they were on low. But if it makes ya feel better I put them on high tonight and the results were exactly the same. Yup, they were on low. But if it makes ya feel better I put them on high tonight and the results were exactly the same.

]]> By: Danhttp://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/comodo-internet-security-38-review-usability-detection-and-removal/#comment-2274 Dan Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:55:21 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=1199#comment-2274 EDIT: it NOT on HIGH by default... Its on LOW..You can check there forum. " What are the defaults for "COMODO - Internet Security" EDIT: it NOT on HIGH by default… Its on LOW..

You can check there forum. ”
What are the defaults for “COMODO – Internet Security”

]]>