<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DefenseWall 2.45 Intro Review On YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:21:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rolo</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-2/#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator>rolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-2343</guid>
		<description>ok matt,
 heres one for you.
I have vista box running kis 2009 ,&amp; ms virtual pc running xp.Inside xp im running commodo &amp; sand boxie. I dont care too much about xp cause if it does get infected i will just reinstall. however my vista box should be 210% solid ehh?
What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok matt,<br />
 heres one for you.<br />
I have vista box running kis 2009 ,&amp; ms virtual pc running xp.Inside xp im running commodo &amp; sand boxie. I dont care too much about xp cause if it does get infected i will just reinstall. however my vista box should be 210% solid ehh?<br />
What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-2/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 09:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>Because of the PatchGuard I can&#039;t implement as strong protection there as I do for x32 OSes. PatchGuard API is incomplete for me. So, my next step is not x64 variant, but outbound traffic control with 2.50 version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of the PatchGuard I can&#8217;t implement as strong protection there as I do for x32 OSes. PatchGuard API is incomplete for me. So, my next step is not x64 variant, but outbound traffic control with 2.50 version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashau</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-2/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>Ilya, any chance for a 64-bit capable version in the near future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilya, any chance for a 64-bit capable version in the near future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-2/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>Yep, sure you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, sure you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>I can use defensewall with avira antivirus and get no problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can use defensewall with avira antivirus and get no problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malwarekilla</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>malwarekilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>@showtime33 - HIPS and Sandboxing are TOTALLY different.  Sandboxing says....&quot;I don&#039;t care what you are, you&#039;re untrusted to me&quot;

HIPS rely&#039;s on a &quot;community database&quot; + heuristics which...yes, can be defeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@showtime33 &#8211; HIPS and Sandboxing are TOTALLY different.  Sandboxing says&#8230;.&#8221;I don&#8217;t care what you are, you&#8217;re untrusted to me&#8221;</p>
<p>HIPS rely&#8217;s on a &#8220;community database&#8221; + heuristics which&#8230;yes, can be defeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: showtime33</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>showtime33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone talking good about KIS 2009....in the past KIS HIPS have been defeated easily.....I myself had issues with full reg/file hips turned on using it.....
Personally I wish avira had a virtual hips...that would be cool...:)
In the meantime I really like defensewall...I believe it works good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone talking good about KIS 2009&#8230;.in the past KIS HIPS have been defeated easily&#8230;..I myself had issues with full reg/file hips turned on using it&#8230;..<br />
Personally I wish avira had a virtual hips&#8230;that would be cool&#8230;:)<br />
In the meantime I really like defensewall&#8230;I believe it works good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>@Adam- DefenseWall do restrict untrusted processes activity according internal ruleset. So, malware won&#039;t be restricted from any actions, but from the malicious ones- yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam- DefenseWall do restrict untrusted processes activity according internal ruleset. So, malware won&#8217;t be restricted from any actions, but from the malicious ones- yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>Can your product be used to execute malware for testing to see what effect the malware would make if executed in real life situation by a person.
Or will the malware be restricted by defensewall from performing any action whatsoever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can your product be used to execute malware for testing to see what effect the malware would make if executed in real life situation by a person.<br />
Or will the malware be restricted by defensewall from performing any action whatsoever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title>
		<link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>@Subgud- if you have set everything as untrusted, &quot;run as trusted&quot; wont work for you as it requires to be sent only from a trusted process. That is why all the software you need to have untrusted is listed at the main site and program&#039;s page. And that is why there is a built-in list of &quot;already known that should be untrusted&quot; apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Subgud- if you have set everything as untrusted, &#8220;run as trusted&#8221; wont work for you as it requires to be sent only from a trusted process. That is why all the software you need to have untrusted is listed at the main site and program&#8217;s page. And that is why there is a built-in list of &#8220;already known that should be untrusted&#8221; apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
