<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: DefenseWall 2.45 Intro Review On YouTube</title> <atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/</link> <description>Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To&#039;s</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-6548</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:28:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-6548</guid> <description>Quick question...You were able to shutdown processes and close .EXE&#039;s...but you didn&#039;t mention anything about &quot;left behind&quot; installation files...and particularly - registry entries.  Does DefenseWall NOT load anything into the registry - but instead create a &quot;duplicate&quot; pseudo registry?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick question&#8230;</p><p>You were able to shutdown processes and close .EXE&#8217;s&#8230;but you didn&#8217;t mention anything about &#8220;left behind&#8221; installation files&#8230;and particularly &#8211; registry entries.  Does DefenseWall NOT load anything into the registry &#8211; but instead create a &#8220;duplicate&#8221; pseudo registry?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wil</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-6208</link> <dc:creator>Wil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:15:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-6208</guid> <description>Which would you use sandboxie or HIPS defense wall?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which would you use sandboxie or HIPS defense wall?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rolo</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-2343</link> <dc:creator>rolo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:25:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-2343</guid> <description>ok matt,
heres one for you.
I have vista box running kis 2009 ,&amp; ms virtual pc running xp.Inside xp im running commodo &amp; sand boxie. I dont care too much about xp cause if it does get infected i will just reinstall. however my vista box should be 210% solid ehh?
What do you think?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok matt,<br
/> heres one for you.<br
/> I have vista box running kis 2009 ,&amp; ms virtual pc running xp.Inside xp im running commodo &amp; sand boxie. I dont care too much about xp cause if it does get infected i will just reinstall. however my vista box should be 210% solid ehh?<br
/> What do you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-1735</link> <dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 09:21:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1735</guid> <description>Because of the PatchGuard I can&#039;t implement as strong protection there as I do for x32 OSes. PatchGuard API is incomplete for me. So, my next step is not x64 variant, but outbound traffic control with 2.50 version.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of the PatchGuard I can&#8217;t implement as strong protection there as I do for x32 OSes. PatchGuard API is incomplete for me. So, my next step is not x64 variant, but outbound traffic control with 2.50 version.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yashau</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-1730</link> <dc:creator>Yashau</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:24:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1730</guid> <description>Ilya, any chance for a 64-bit capable version in the near future?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilya, any chance for a 64-bit capable version in the near future?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-1691</link> <dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:48:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1691</guid> <description>Yep, sure you can.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, sure you can.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: david</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-1688</link> <dc:creator>david</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1688</guid> <description>I can use defensewall with avira antivirus and get no problems?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can use defensewall with avira antivirus and get no problems?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malwarekilla</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-1474</link> <dc:creator>malwarekilla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:55:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1474</guid> <description>@showtime33 - HIPS and Sandboxing are TOTALLY different.  Sandboxing says....&quot;I don&#039;t care what you are, you&#039;re untrusted to me&quot;HIPS rely&#039;s on a &quot;community database&quot; + heuristics which...yes, can be defeated.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@showtime33 &#8211; HIPS and Sandboxing are TOTALLY different.  Sandboxing says&#8230;.&#8221;I don&#8217;t care what you are, you&#8217;re untrusted to me&#8221;</p><p>HIPS rely&#8217;s on a &#8220;community database&#8221; + heuristics which&#8230;yes, can be defeated.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: showtime33</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-1472</link> <dc:creator>showtime33</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:40:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1472</guid> <description>Why is everyone talking good about KIS 2009....in the past KIS HIPS have been defeated easily.....I myself had issues with full reg/file hips turned on using it.....
Personally I wish avira had a virtual hips...that would be cool...:)
In the meantime I really like defensewall...I believe it works good.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone talking good about KIS 2009&#8230;.in the past KIS HIPS have been defeated easily&#8230;..I myself had issues with full reg/file hips turned on using it&#8230;..<br
/> Personally I wish avira had a virtual hips&#8230;that would be cool&#8230;:)<br
/> In the meantime I really like defensewall&#8230;I believe it works good.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/defensewall-245-intro-review-on-youtube/#comment-1395</link> <dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:56:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=622#comment-1395</guid> <description>@Adam- DefenseWall do restrict untrusted processes activity according internal ruleset. So, malware won&#039;t be restricted from any actions, but from the malicious ones- yes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam- DefenseWall do restrict untrusted processes activity according internal ruleset. So, malware won&#8217;t be restricted from any actions, but from the malicious ones- yes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 26/34 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 598/604 objects using disk: basic

Served from: remove-malware.com @ 2012-02-11 22:05:54 -->
