<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: GeSWall 2.8 Prevention Review</title> <atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/</link> <description>Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To&#039;s</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: demoneye</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/#comment-2523</link> <dc:creator>demoneye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:40:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1226#comment-2523</guid> <description>@ RejZoRu can use defensewall or sanboxie as primary defense without any AV , i use such method for 2 years got 0 infection.GesWall is shit , it do a lots of problem , blocking some time legitimate sites .for example try install  &quot;last pass&quot; add on for FireFox and check GesWall log , u will see it got flood hi, self till your pc stuckcheers</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ RejZoR</p><p>u can use defensewall or sanboxie as primary defense without any AV , i use such method for 2 years got 0 infection.</p><p>GesWall is shit , it do a lots of problem , blocking some time legitimate sites .</p><p>for example try install  &#8220;last pass&#8221; add on for FireFox and check GesWall log , u will see it got flood hi, self till your pc stuck</p><p>cheers</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: f</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/#comment-2386</link> <dc:creator>f</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:56:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1226#comment-2386</guid> <description>can you please turn off the artifiual click sounds?i find that kinda annoyingand you fixed the adio sycn problemsnicelayerd securtiy the besthow awesome would be a sute made of norton av+behavior detection+firewall+avira 9.0 for detection too+ comodo for hips in like an advanced mode+geswallthat would be pretty much garenteed proctection
unless you go crazy and turn stupid and stuff
nothing is stupid proof
and if it was free...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you please turn off the artifiual click sounds?</p><p>i find that kinda annoying</p><p>and you fixed the adio sycn problems</p><p>nice</p><p>layerd securtiy the best</p><p>how awesome would be a sute made of norton av+behavior detection+firewall+avira 9.0 for detection too+ comodo for hips in like an advanced mode+geswall</p><p>that would be pretty much garenteed proctection<br
/> unless you go crazy and turn stupid and stuff<br
/> nothing is stupid proof<br
/> and if it was free&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 3xist</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/#comment-2378</link> <dc:creator>3xist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:42:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1226#comment-2378</guid> <description>Layered Security:
Prevention
Detection
CureYou need all 3 to provide protection, Can&#039;t just have a Prevention solution by it self or a detection solution by it self.Cheers,
Josh</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Layered Security:<br
/> Prevention<br
/> Detection<br
/> Cure</p><p>You need all 3 to provide protection, Can&#8217;t just have a Prevention solution by it self or a detection solution by it self.</p><p>Cheers,<br
/> Josh</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcos N. Pesic</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/#comment-2374</link> <dc:creator>Marcos N. Pesic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:10:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1226#comment-2374</guid> <description>Awesome review !
Great video and Sound quality.
Loved the yellow mouse shadow.The only thing I did not liked was the &quot;loud&quot; mouse click sound.Keep up the good work !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome review !<br
/> Great video and Sound quality.<br
/> Loved the yellow mouse shadow.</p><p>The only thing I did not liked was the &#8220;loud&#8221; mouse click sound.</p><p>Keep up the good work !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: m00nbl00d</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/#comment-2366</link> <dc:creator>m00nbl00d</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:40:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1226#comment-2366</guid> <description>It&#039;s a great piece of security software indeed. But, I wouldn&#039;t use it alone against everything out there.Also, there is still the need for antimalware products, because it&#039;s up to to the antimalware to say - Hey, this is a piece of malware.Products like GesWall, DefenseWall HIPS, Sandboxie, etc, are great tools, but they should be used in a layered security. They&#039;re a great way for people, in the of their browsing, for example, say I want to keep this and that files, and lose everything else.What people don&#039;t know, and they will still allow it to run, and would have no reason not to, is if the file has been tampered or not.It&#039;s possible to read word, pdf, etc documents in an isolated environment, but, if we&#039;re talking about applications, and if they got tampered, there&#039;s just no way to know if something is suppose to be happening or not, and people would just trust the known application, like the one you gave example of, CCleaner.So, antimalware products aren&#039;t outdated. The only thing is that, nowadays, no single tool can keep up with the malware evolution. Simple fact. That&#039;s why a layered security approach is needed, starting with limited user accounts.You said it yourself that you use Avira free just in case, right? ;)Regards</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a great piece of security software indeed. But, I wouldn&#8217;t use it alone against everything out there.</p><p>Also, there is still the need for antimalware products, because it&#8217;s up to to the antimalware to say &#8211; Hey, this is a piece of malware.</p><p>Products like GesWall, DefenseWall HIPS, Sandboxie, etc, are great tools, but they should be used in a layered security. They&#8217;re a great way for people, in the of their browsing, for example, say I want to keep this and that files, and lose everything else.</p><p>What people don&#8217;t know, and they will still allow it to run, and would have no reason not to, is if the file has been tampered or not.</p><p>It&#8217;s possible to read word, pdf, etc documents in an isolated environment, but, if we&#8217;re talking about applications, and if they got tampered, there&#8217;s just no way to know if something is suppose to be happening or not, and people would just trust the known application, like the one you gave example of, CCleaner.</p><p>So, antimalware products aren&#8217;t outdated. The only thing is that, nowadays, no single tool can keep up with the malware evolution. Simple fact. That&#8217;s why a layered security approach is needed, starting with limited user accounts.</p><p>You said it yourself that you use Avira free just in case, right? <img
src='http://remove-malware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Regards</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RejZoR</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/geswall-28-prevention-review/#comment-2364</link> <dc:creator>RejZoR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:32:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1226#comment-2364</guid> <description>Have you tried GesWall against file infectors?
Because their free version did exactly nothing against Virut.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried GesWall against file infectors?<br
/> Because their free version did exactly nothing against Virut.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 537/547 objects using disk: basic

Served from: remove-malware.com @ 2012-05-22 00:58:26 -->
