<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Panda Antivirus 2008 Beta Review</title> <atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/</link> <description>Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To&#039;s</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: VJ</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-208</link> <dc:creator>VJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:52:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-208</guid> <description>Hi Malwarekilla,
I agree for your kind of work it may not be right. But for my corporate setup, its good since we have large bandwidth with all machines directly/indirectly connected to Internet. Right now I have Panda Subscription for our machines. As of 2008, their detection is decent. Not at par with others.
But the Panda Sales person, convinced us that Panda 2009 will solve all that. So I want to know if their is any truth in their statements. Mcafee also has a similar in-lab solution called Artemis , which dramatically increased their detection (http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse/mcafee_artemis.pdf). And since Panda is the only one to release such a technology in  a public product, just want to know how much is the truth before we commit.Also a clarification on your test procedure. Why don&#039;t you do the memory scan as in Setup ?? In most cases, when you go to install software you would remove malware in memory, so that the AV install is not affected. Right ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Malwarekilla,<br
/> I agree for your kind of work it may not be right. But for my corporate setup, its good since we have large bandwidth with all machines directly/indirectly connected to Internet. Right now I have Panda Subscription for our machines. As of 2008, their detection is decent. Not at par with others.<br
/> But the Panda Sales person, convinced us that Panda 2009 will solve all that. So I want to know if their is any truth in their statements. Mcafee also has a similar in-lab solution called Artemis , which dramatically increased their detection (<a
href="http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse/mcafee_artemis.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse/mcafee_artemis.pdf</a>). And since Panda is the only one to release such a technology in  a public product, just want to know how much is the truth before we commit.</p><p>Also a clarification on your test procedure. Why don&#8217;t you do the memory scan as in Setup ?? In most cases, when you go to install software you would remove malware in memory, so that the AV install is not affected. Right ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-206</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-206</guid> <description>If they dont have an internetconnection, they cant update there Antivirus? So you should´nt have Internet connection at all? Just install the AV and then scan?By the way, why do you do this reviews? What´s the point?
No fence, i think it´s fun to watch your reviews =)peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they dont have an internetconnection, they cant update there Antivirus? So you should´nt have Internet connection at all? Just install the AV and then scan?</p><p>By the way, why do you do this reviews? What´s the point?<br
/> No fence, i think it´s fun to watch your reviews =)</p><p>peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malwarekilla</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-205</link> <dc:creator>malwarekilla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:27:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-205</guid> <description>Everybody!  On the cloud thing...I will upload a short video on CLOUD, however I&#039;m not endorsing anything that REQUIRES an internet connection.When I&#039;m on location with a client there is a pretty good chance they will not have an internet connection due to a massive infection or a disconnection from their ISP due to spamming/port scanning.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody!  On the cloud thing&#8230;I will upload a short video on CLOUD, however I&#8217;m not endorsing anything that REQUIRES an internet connection.</p><p>When I&#8217;m on location with a client there is a pretty good chance they will not have an internet connection due to a massive infection or a disconnection from their ISP due to spamming/port scanning.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bar</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-203</link> <dc:creator>Bar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:37:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-203</guid> <description>Hey Matt .
i told you thet panda is very bad anti-virus ...
i know cuz in our forums in israel we are tasting all the anti-viruss...
any way can you try BitDefanders ?...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt .<br
/> i told you thet panda is very bad anti-virus &#8230;<br
/> i know cuz in our forums in israel we are tasting all the anti-viruss&#8230;<br
/> any way can you try BitDefanders ?&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dada</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-202</link> <dc:creator>Dada</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:42:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-202</guid> <description>If you are so smart why don&#039;t you test it?Leave him alone....i think he has a life!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are so smart why don&#8217;t you test it?Leave him alone&#8230;.i think he has a life!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-201</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-201</guid> <description>You said that Panda cant delete the Virus, only in safe mode.
it just stuck at Virusheat, it deleted the virus that been detected so far what i could seen. I use the beta and it has crash for me just like it had for you in the start up.I think you should do the review again when Panda has published their 2009 Version, and scan IN THE CLOUD.
Dont understund why you did´nt do that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said that Panda cant delete the Virus, only in safe mode.<br
/> it just stuck at Virusheat, it deleted the virus that been detected so far what i could seen. I use the beta and it has crash for me just like it had for you in the start up.</p><p>I think you should do the review again when Panda has published their 2009 Version, and scan IN THE CLOUD.<br
/> Dont understund why you did´nt do that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonte</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-200</link> <dc:creator>Jonte</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:22:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-200</guid> <description>Yes i i think you should use the Collective Intillegence with scanning from the cloud!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i i think you should use the Collective Intillegence with scanning from the cloud!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: VJ</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-199</link> <dc:creator>VJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:57:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-199</guid> <description>hate to me be nit pick. But could you also check out the cloud av functionality. Basically when panda scans any file as suspicious, it will send data to its Cloud solution called Collective Intelligence to give cure instantly.I see in video review 2, you actually cancel the prompt to enable net connection to allow this. I just want to know, if this actually increases their detection.see: http://it.tmcnet.com/topics/it/articles/33301-panda-security-launches-beta-panda-internet-security-2009.htm</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hate to me be nit pick. But could you also check out the cloud av functionality. Basically when panda scans any file as suspicious, it will send data to its Cloud solution called Collective Intelligence to give cure instantly.</p><p>I see in video review 2, you actually cancel the prompt to enable net connection to allow this. I just want to know, if this actually increases their detection.</p><p>see: <a
href="http://it.tmcnet.com/topics/it/articles/33301-panda-security-launches-beta-panda-internet-security-2009.htm" rel="nofollow">http://it.tmcnet.com/topics/it/articles/33301-panda-security-launches-beta-panda-internet-security-2009.htm</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: VJ</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/panda-antivirus-2008-beta-review/#comment-198</link> <dc:creator>VJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:34:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=232#comment-198</guid> <description>Are you sure about Panda 2008 beta ???
As far as I know, Panda 2009 was in beta and Panda 2008 has been released 10 months ago ....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure about Panda 2008 beta ???<br
/> As far as I know, Panda 2009 was in beta and Panda 2008 has been released 10 months ago &#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 26/34 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 584/590 objects using disk: basic

Served from: remove-malware.com @ 2012-02-11 21:46:31 -->
