<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Spyware Doctor with Antivirus 2010 Videos Day1</title> <atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/</link> <description>Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To&#039;s</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Marcos N. Pesic</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4391</link> <dc:creator>Marcos N. Pesic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:26:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4391</guid> <description>@123zapWindows Vista without patches have one know bug when handling larger number of files.
In some ocassions moving 5MB could require more than 1 minute.
It´s not about &quot;how many files&quot; or &quot;how large&quot; the system is... but it´s a know bug that was patched.It may, or may not be the case it the spyware doctor.
Altough you are right to... maybe vmware box is causing some slowdown.I think bouth are causing damage to antivirus scan speed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@123zap</p><p>Windows Vista without patches have one know bug when handling larger number of files.<br
/> In some ocassions moving 5MB could require more than 1 minute.<br
/> It´s not about &#8220;how many files&#8221; or &#8220;how large&#8221; the system is&#8230; but it´s a know bug that was patched.</p><p>It may, or may not be the case it the spyware doctor.<br
/> Altough you are right to&#8230; maybe vmware box is causing some slowdown.</p><p>I think bouth are causing damage to antivirus scan speed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 123zap</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4389</link> <dc:creator>123zap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:28:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4389</guid> <description>@Marcos N. Pesic
Again, vista patches do not reduce the amount of files vista needs, they just make vista work better.I think I am still going with my idea about vista in the VM being the problem.  Virtual machines have a way of slowing everything down.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marcos N. Pesic<br
/> Again, vista patches do not reduce the amount of files vista needs, they just make vista work better.</p><p>I think I am still going with my idea about vista in the VM being the problem.  Virtual machines have a way of slowing everything down.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcos N. Pesic</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4379</link> <dc:creator>Marcos N. Pesic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:08:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4379</guid> <description>@123zap
I did not tested SpywareDoctor with a patched Windows Vista.
But I know that the &quot;unpatched&quot; version of it is very slow when working with a big amount of files (like a antivirus scan).SpywareDoctor may be slow... but I am pretty sure that it is not THAT slow.So I really think that the VISTA BOX will be a problem.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@123zap<br
/> I did not tested SpywareDoctor with a patched Windows Vista.<br
/> But I know that the &#8220;unpatched&#8221; version of it is very slow when working with a big amount of files (like a antivirus scan).</p><p>SpywareDoctor may be slow&#8230; but I am pretty sure that it is not THAT slow.</p><p>So I really think that the VISTA BOX will be a problem.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 123zap</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4377</link> <dc:creator>123zap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4377</guid> <description>@Marcos N. Pesic
The vista box could be part of the problem (it is more likely the VM environment that is causing the problem), but spyware doctor is also very slow anyway.  Patching vista would not make Spyware Doctor scan faster though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marcos N. Pesic<br
/> The vista box could be part of the problem (it is more likely the VM environment that is causing the problem), but spyware doctor is also very slow anyway.  Patching vista would not make Spyware Doctor scan faster though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harry</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4373</link> <dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4373</guid> <description>good vid matt but i cant belive that spy doctor whith av faild so badly pctools has been so good for so long and now its totaly rubbishbtw avg 9.0 has fixed its installer and is ment to be really good</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good vid matt but i cant belive that spy doctor whith av faild so badly pctools has been so good for so long and now its totaly rubbish</p><p>btw avg 9.0 has fixed its installer and is ment to be really good</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcos N. Pesic</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4372</link> <dc:creator>Marcos N. Pesic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:09:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4372</guid> <description>I think that your VISTA BOX is causing the slow scan time speed, not the antivirus.Windows Vista has several bugs when it is working with several files... the only way to be sure is be Updating yor Vista BOX with SP2 and all patchs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that your VISTA BOX is causing the slow scan time speed, not the antivirus.</p><p>Windows Vista has several bugs when it is working with several files&#8230; the only way to be sure is be Updating yor Vista BOX with SP2 and all patchs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcos N. Pesic</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4371</link> <dc:creator>Marcos N. Pesic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:09:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4371</guid> <description>I think that your BOX with VISTA is the cause of the slow scan.
Vista SO have zilion bugs when handling a larger nunbers of files.
The only way to be &quot;imparcial&quot; would be to:Have your VISTA BOX with ALL Microsoft PatchsorDo a comparison with others AVs in this BOX and in a similar XP box.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that your BOX with VISTA is the cause of the slow scan.<br
/> Vista SO have zilion bugs when handling a larger nunbers of files.<br
/> The only way to be &#8220;imparcial&#8221; would be to:</p><p>Have your VISTA BOX with ALL Microsoft Patchs</p><p>or</p><p>Do a comparison with others AVs in this BOX and in a similar XP box.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Snorky</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/spyware-doctor-with-antivirus-2010-videos-day1/#comment-4368</link> <dc:creator>Snorky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:01:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=1873#comment-4368</guid> <description>When did you start doing reviews while drunk?
Nice touch.;-)snorks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did you start doing reviews while drunk?<br
/> Nice touch.</p><p> <img
src='http://remove-malware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>snorks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 26/34 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 574/580 objects using disk: basic

Served from: remove-malware.com @ 2012-02-11 22:16:33 -->
