http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/superantispyware-detection-and-removal-video-nov-test-2/ Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To's Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/superantispyware-detection-and-removal-video-nov-test-2/#comment-4048 Nikul Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:03:04 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=615#comment-4048 i am not sure if this is SAS but after scanning one infected machine my friend gets one error on boot up saying "Interactive Logon Process Initialization has failed"...anyone knows how to resolve this??? i am not sure if this is SAS but after scanning one infected machine my friend gets one error on boot up saying “Interactive Logon Process Initialization has failed”…anyone knows how to resolve this???

]]> http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/superantispyware-detection-and-removal-video-nov-test-2/#comment-1207 robin Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:12:53 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=615#comment-1207 SAS is better at realtime protection, but both are good for just on-demand scanning:) SAS is better at realtime protection, but both are good for just on-demand scanning:)

]]> http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/superantispyware-detection-and-removal-video-nov-test-2/#comment-1204 927 Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:34:21 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=615#comment-1204 is it not possible to start the windows installer service in safe mode? is it not possible to start the windows installer service in safe mode?

]]> http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/superantispyware-detection-and-removal-video-nov-test-2/#comment-1190 Dieselman Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:53:16 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=615#comment-1190 Ok so Matt. I know this is hard to answer but which do you think is better overall. SAS or MBAM? Ok so Matt. I know this is hard to answer but which do you think is better overall. SAS or MBAM?

]]> http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/superantispyware-detection-and-removal-video-nov-test-2/#comment-1186 malwarekilla Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:18:04 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=615#comment-1186 Ahhh...I see. That makes sense. I still wish there was a "different type of installer" for us tech's that rely on safemode and bootable discs. Ahhh…I see. That makes sense. I still wish there was a “different type of installer” for us tech’s that rely on safemode and bootable discs.

]]> http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/anti-malware-reviews/superantispyware-detection-and-removal-video-nov-test-2/#comment-1173 /*\ Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:13:02 +0000 http://remove-malware.com/?p=615#comment-1173 About the Windows installer/Safe mode install... MS has requested that, in order to be "MS certified", an application has to follow a certain list of rules... one of them is that they have to use the windows installer if they want to be certified (better debugging/troubleshooting support, etc.). Some companies really find MS certification important and will follow their rules (Kaspersky, ESET (I think), most of the security companies etc.)On the other hand there are those who find it more important not having MS limitations (can't install in safe mode, kernel patching etc.). Blame it on MS, lol :P About the Windows installer/Safe mode install… MS has requested that, in order to be “MS certified”, an application has to follow a certain list of rules… one of them is that they have to use the windows installer if they want to be certified (better debugging/troubleshooting support, etc.). Some companies really find MS certification important and will follow their rules (Kaspersky, ESET (I think), most of the security companies etc.)On the other hand there are those who find it more important not having MS limitations (can’t install in safe mode, kernel patching etc.). Blame it on MS, lol

]]>