<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Double AntiSpy – Rated #1?</title> <atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/</link> <description>Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To&#039;s</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Eaten</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-8295</link> <dc:creator>Eaten</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:51:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-8295</guid> <description>WOT detected it as a rouge</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOT detected it as a rouge</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4387</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:41:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4387</guid> <description>Get a mac. Problem solved</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get a mac. Problem solved</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4308</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:23:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4308</guid> <description>For the record, I hate the commercial on Sirius and I distrust any software that needs to advertise on Stern&#039;s show, even though I like Stern&#039;s show.As for it not being on CNet, it is listed.  You have to search for &quot;double anti-spy&quot; with the hyphen.  That&#039;s the way the product is spelled.  It comes up with one hit, but the hit is not CNet rated.  So they are still untruthful about that.Even that search term doesn&#039;t come up on PC Mag though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I hate the commercial on Sirius and I distrust any software that needs to advertise on Stern&#8217;s show, even though I like Stern&#8217;s show.</p><p>As for it not being on CNet, it is listed.  You have to search for &#8220;double anti-spy&#8221; with the hyphen.  That&#8217;s the way the product is spelled.  It comes up with one hit, but the hit is not CNet rated.  So they are still untruthful about that.</p><p>Even that search term doesn&#8217;t come up on PC Mag though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kaixi</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4108</link> <dc:creator>Kaixi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:05:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4108</guid> <description>I clicked on &quot;Run a free scan&quot; and it asked me to download a 190 MB file. WTF?!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I clicked on &#8220;Run a free scan&#8221; and it asked me to download a 190 MB file. WTF?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ryan</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4007</link> <dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:52:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4007</guid> <description>They where false advertising there product and saying they where better than all other just like cyber defender bluepoint security.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They where false advertising there product and saying they where better than all other just like cyber defender bluepoint security.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malwarekilla</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4006</link> <dc:creator>malwarekilla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:35:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4006</guid> <description>@Clinon and others - I never thought it was a rogue, I simply said their radio advertisement stated it (Double AntiSpy) was rated #1 by CNET and PC Mag when in fact it was NOT (it wasn&#039;t even listed).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clinon and others &#8211; I never thought it was a rogue, I simply said their radio advertisement stated it (Double AntiSpy) was rated #1 by CNET and PC Mag when in fact it was NOT (it wasn&#8217;t even listed).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clinon</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4005</link> <dc:creator>Clinon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:07:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4005</guid> <description>Ok, first of all you guys do even know its a rouge. you have&#039;nt even used it. I don&#039;t really buy products online I can get it at stores like staples and right now i use ca internet security suite plus 2009, it comes with my isp and it reports www.avanquest.com as a safe site, even mcafee site advisor does.P.S. Don&#039;t judge software by how it looks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, first of all you guys do even know its a rouge. you have&#8217;nt even used it. I don&#8217;t really buy products online I can get it at stores like staples and right now i use ca internet security suite plus 2009, it comes with my isp and it reports <a
href="http://www.avanquest.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.avanquest.com</a> as a safe site, even mcafee site advisor does.</p><p>P.S. Don&#8217;t judge software by how it looks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Buck</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4003</link> <dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:36:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4003</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think Matt ever tested Counterspy from Sunbelt Software,why I don&#039;t know. I believe it&#039;s in the top 3 Antispyware programs out there. I know it&#039;s good at removing Rogue AV&#039;s and other nasty&#039;s. I have used it to remove Super Antispyware Master that Eset Smart Security couldn&#039;t even fine. I trust it and use it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Matt ever tested Counterspy from Sunbelt Software,why I don&#8217;t know. I believe it&#8217;s in the top 3 Antispyware programs out there. I know it&#8217;s good at removing Rogue AV&#8217;s and other nasty&#8217;s. I have used it to remove Super Antispyware Master that Eset Smart Security couldn&#8217;t even fine. I trust it and use it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: max</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4001</link> <dc:creator>max</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:20:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4001</guid> <description>Iam using defensewall and sandboxie with out any firewall. is there any reason to get a firewall or am i ok with out it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iam using defensewall and sandboxie with out any firewall. is there any reason to get a firewall or am i ok with out it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SSS20</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4000</link> <dc:creator>SSS20</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:12:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/antimalware/avoid-this/double-antispy-%e2%80%93-rated-1/#comment-4000</guid> <description>@Benny
That &quot; 237 traces of malware&quot;   are all fake !
you never haded on your computer... !trust me ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Benny<br
/> That &#8221; 237 traces of malware&#8221;   are all fake !<br
/> you never haded on your computer&#8230; !trust me <img
src='http://remove-malware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 582/600 objects using disk: basic

Served from: remove-malware.com @ 2012-05-22 02:05:38 -->
