http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0jUHl4uiRY
I found this one of member on wilders
and ESET did fail it (The test make with all default settings)
Remove-Malware.com Forums
Keeping Malware At Bay...Together
ESET review
If this topic has helped you then please...
- sss20
- Master Contributor
- Posts: 3358
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:43 am
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Have thanks: 151 times
- OS: Windows 7 Professional
- Architecture: 64bit
Re: ESET review
by jamescv7 » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:36 pm
Yes for sure but if its not on default and been tweak then there is a chance the result will be nice.
- jamescv7
- Master Contributor
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:14 am
- Location: Riyadh,Saudi Arabia
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Have thanks: 54 times
- OS: Windows XP Professional
- Architecture: 32bit
Eset.....-
liljj2009 - Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:27 pm
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia(U.S.A.)
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Have thanks: 0 time
Re: ESET review
by Dieselman » Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:48 pm
I tried for the longest time to tell hemingway that NOD32 is not all that. But he wont listen.
- Dieselman
Re: ESET review
by malwarebuster » Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:51 pm
This is the reason why I will not be going back to Nod32.
- malwarebuster
- Regular Contributor
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:33 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Have thanks: 8 times
- OS: Windows 7 Home
- Architecture: 64bit
Re: ESET review
by jamescv7 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:05 am
I read some post on wilders then they said that if you disable the web protection you disable the signatures, heuristics and etc...........
- jamescv7
- Master Contributor
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:14 am
- Location: Riyadh,Saudi Arabia
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Have thanks: 54 times
- OS: Windows XP Professional
- Architecture: 32bit
Re: ESET review
by hemingway60 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:57 am
No offense but you are all wrong! Web access protection was disabled. Real-time protection was enabled but antivirus and antispyware protection wasn't! He didn't show us how he installed it, is it up to date or whether he played with any setting. He didn't scan and see if NOD32 can remove the threats. The test is a TOTAL FAILURE!!
EDIT: Matt and 123zap have both tested it and showed the steps clearly and it did good. This guy didn't. And what do you mean by Partially Blocked? I didn't see any rogue, did you? Why didn't he show the task manager along with the things which NOD32 has "Partially Blocked"? Why on earth is web access protection disabled? Who knows if he unchecked other things? The review is CRAP.
Most probably an ESET hater. One more thing, AV-comparatives won't give the bronze medal to an Antivirus that stinks in detection!
EDIT: Matt and 123zap have both tested it and showed the steps clearly and it did good. This guy didn't. And what do you mean by Partially Blocked? I didn't see any rogue, did you? Why didn't he show the task manager along with the things which NOD32 has "Partially Blocked"? Why on earth is web access protection disabled? Who knows if he unchecked other things? The review is CRAP.
Most probably an ESET hater. One more thing, AV-comparatives won't give the bronze medal to an Antivirus that stinks in detection!
Last edited by hemingway60 on Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Windows 7 64 bit
Browser: IE9 BETA with WOT
Real-time: ESS4, MBAM Pro
Firewall/HIPS: OA Pro
Key-logger: KeyScrambler Pro
-
hemingway60 - Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:40 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Have thanks: 14 times
24 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest