CIS vs KIS vs AIS

[Dieselman]

GakunGak..........When is the last time you used KIS? At the default settings it does not ask you squat.

[GakunGak]

EDIT: wrong info

[Dieselman]

CIS is only good if you answer correctly to the pop ups. GakunGak.........Dont complain about KIS asking you too many questions when it was you that turned off Automatic Actions. Its like setting CIS to "paranoid" then wondering why you get so many pop ups.

[malwarebuster]

KIS.

[woops]

+1 to all those that said KIS, install and forget, KIS has it hands down.


not to mention the dection rates........... Come on guy's get a clue

[Dieselman]

Right now both my "avp.exe" are using an anywhere from 10,000K-12,000K. Lighter doesn't mean its better. I could care less how much ram a program uses cause I have plenty of power to run anything. I have seen programs use as little as 1,000K of ram but yet slow homeboy's pc down. I have seen programs use as much as 60,000K of ram but yet the pc runs fine.

[Watasha]

hey woops..........Get a clue? If I have CIS and my system runs great, no malware gets through and I'm very happy with it....what clue should I get? KIS & CIS are both very competent security suites, they both work. To sit there and scream *detection* when I have clearly explained *prevention* is pointless and ignorant. I have a clue, so do all of the Comodo and Kaspersky users who have clean, uninfected systems.

[woops]

hay man, chill out, if u want "PREVENTION" I say KIS & COMODO is good at PREVENTION I already stated that COMODO has great PREVENTION, but I chose KIS!!!!!

EDITED by me

[Watasha]

Chill out? I'm fine, no problem here. I think KIS is great but you insinuated that everyone who likes CIS was clueless. We're not IE users or anything.

Tor32.....Why should this be locked, to save us from discussion? Nobody's flaming here, we may disagree but that's the fun part. Please God don't turn this into "that other security forum".

[woops]

+1 Watasha