CIS vs KIS vs AIS

[Dieselman]

mdfareez..........CIS DOES NOT HAVE Parent Controls. Comodo doesnt even list Parent Controls as a feature. KIS does. KIS's Parent Controls blocks web pages, prevents certain programs from running and can be set to only access the internet at a certain time. Those are Parent Controls. What you are talking about is setting CIS to be silent. Thats not the same and thats not DEFAULT. CIS does not have a web shield and cannot filter we traffic. This is why CIS will let you download the "eicar test" file with no alerts. KIS blocks all 3 eicar test as soon as you click on them. Show me a screen shot of CIS doing what KIS did in my screen shot. Out of the box...............KIS wins hands down all day long.

Improved! Parental Controls - Protects your children online by limiting time and access to inappropriate sites, instant messaging, games, and online auctions.

http://www.kaspersky.com/kaspersky_internet_security

Kudos ALookingInView. Nice one.

[mdfareez]

ALookingInView,

(and please, do it in relation to malware blocking and prevention), as quoted.

who cares about detection rate when it can block and prevent everything?

who cares about behaviour blocker when it can block and prevent everything?

LIKE I SAID, IN RELATION TO MALWARE BLOCKING AND PREVENTION, show me how KIS is superior.

[mdfareez]

Dieselman,

you clearly don't know CIS well enough, i guess. here is a screenshot to help you understand CIS has parental control.



CIS allows the download of the eicar tests, but does it allow it to execute? downloading something doesn't get you infected, Dieselman. EXECUTING IT DOES.

[ALookingInView]

Because some of that stuff is going to eventually get run.
No one downloads something wanting it to get blocked.
They're going to eventually run it and when they do..

..will CAV detect it? Maybe not.
..will CIS's BB kick in if CAV misses it? Nope, no BB.

As far as pure blocking then CIS appears equal to KIS, I'll give you that.
But it's eventually going to get run if it was downloaded on purpose.

EDIT: Yes, I'm aware that the unknown will be sandboxed, but the sandbox has been proven to be faulty, not to mention not everyone is gonna like their MSN Smileys not being able to install properly because they're sandboxed.

[mdfareez]

ALookingInView,

you are under the assumption that CAV won't detect it.

next, who needs a behaviour blocker, when CIS has Defense+ ?

[Dieselman]

mdfareez...........Thats the problem with CIS. Comodo relies to heavily on D+. They do this cause there av is weak. KIS has a strong av. A HIPS is a back up and NOT a means of being your first line of defense. Watch the video's mdfareez as I have mentioned. There you will see where KIS beats CIS. Blocking malware out of the box with NO user intervention. mdfareez..............................THOSE ARE NOT PARENT CONTROLS. Parent Controls are more then just password blocking. Parent Controls should contain what I have quoted. Just about ever program out there has a password that can be set so no settings can be changed. Can CIS prevent you child from looking up porn. NO. KIS can. Can CIS stop your child from accessing the internet when your not around. NO. KIS can. Can CIS block block your child from chatting. NO. KIS can. Can CIS track where your child has been. NO. KIS can. Those are Parent Controls. These are Parent Controls.

[mdfareez]

haha, its funny how CIS loses out to KIS solely based on Parental Controls.

there are many programs out there which offers excellent Parental Controls feature, we don't need it to be integrated within our daily AVs. and clearly, it shouldn't be used as a benchmark when it comes to REMOVAL and BLOCKING of malware.

we need to benchmark the effectiveness and efficiency of AVs to something bigger than Parental Controls. and i'm sure anyone will agree the PREVENTION and BLOCKING malware feature stands out above the rest.

yes, i'm sure Parental Controls marks the epitome of success for any security suite out there.

i hope, my sarcasm is sensed.

[Dieselman]

mdfareez..............Do you any children? I dont think so. I do and I love KIS's Parent Controls. I feel completely and total safe when my Son is using my laptop signed in under his name. I have tried just about every porn and keygen site I know and KIS blocks them all when under Parent Controls. There is a feature that CIS cannot do. There are more Parents out there then users such as yourself who want a way to filter the internet for there children. Can you turn off CAV and its sandbox and still stop malware with NO user intervention needed. KIS can. I can turn off KAV and I still have Application Activity monitoring stuff.

[mdfareez]

the bottom line is,

CIS can BLOCK and PREVENT any malware thrown at it.

perhaps, KIS can do the same too.

that still doesn't explain how KIS is better than CIS at PREVENTION and BLOCKING capabilities.

personally, i don't even use CAV because i know what i'm doing.

i'm still trying to get something past Comodo's Defense+, but i keep failing miserably.

[ALookingInView]

Who says that CIS can perform this "REMOVAL" of malware?
I mean if it can't detect it, how is it going to remove it?

Defense+ is strong, but IMO you (apparently not you personally) NEED a BB and better detection.