Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Questions and Statements about which software products are better.
WARNING: Discussions may get heated

If this topic has helped you then please...



 

Opera vs. Chrome vs Firefox

Opera
6
19%
Chrome
7
23%
Firefox
18
58%
 
Total votes : 31

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby pranaygtr » Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:23 am

I'm an id!ot... I think there is an compatibility issue with Prevx SafeOnline and Google Chrome.

However, Chrome has crashed on me few times a day, even while PSO is disabled.

Anyways, I will continue to use Chrome.
pranaygtr
Elite Contributor
 
Posts: 5045
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:14 am
Has thanked: 96 times
Have thanks: 72 times
OS: Other
Architecture: 64bit

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Advertisement

Advertisement
 

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby Vilmis » Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:58 am

pranaygtr you don't use Opera anymore because of it's memory usage? ;)
Image
User avatar
Vilmis
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:07 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby XPdude » Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:47 am

I say Firefox. Some sites on Chrome and Opera take nearly 10 seconds to load (e.g hotmail, gmail). I have a 6mbps internet speed which isn't too bad. Firefox takes about 0.5 seconds to open it. Also since Chrome sandboxes each tab, the RAM usage becomes extreme. Each extension you install on Chrome also takes it's toll. On Opera, whenever I go to youtube it gives a html error so I have to refresh the browser to make it work. So IMO, Firefox wins
User avatar
XPdude
Junior Contributor
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:57 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby ALookingInView » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:10 am

I don't experience those issues with Hotmail and GMail on Chrome.
RAM hog it is, though I'd much rather spend more physical RAM on my browser to have the added security that Chrome's sandboxing provides.
Microsoft Windows 7 Armor Premium /  Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0 Beta  /  Sandboxie 3.48
Common Sense 2011 Pro  /  ShadowProtect Desktop Edition 4.0.2

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
rM Rules
User avatar
ALookingInView
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:54 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 1 time

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby XPdude » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:12 am

Their added security is really good but they should try and reduce the RAM usage. Each process using 40 megs is not good
User avatar
XPdude
Junior Contributor
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:57 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby ALookingInView » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:19 am

The vast majority of my Chrome processes are using ~12MB each.
It's not unheard of for a chrome.exe instance to gobble up 40+ megs, but it's not the norm.
Microsoft Windows 7 Armor Premium /  Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0 Beta  /  Sandboxie 3.48
Common Sense 2011 Pro  /  ShadowProtect Desktop Edition 4.0.2

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
rM Rules
User avatar
ALookingInView
Senior Contributor
 
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:54 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 1 time

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby malwarebuster » Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:07 pm

Well I am ditching chrome. Going back to firefox.
Image
malwarebuster
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 535
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:33 am
Has thanked: 18 times
Have thanks: 8 times
OS: Windows 7 Home
Architecture: 64bit

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby MNxShootAllSkaters » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:36 pm

For me its gotta be chrome... love the speed
User avatar
MNxShootAllSkaters
Junior Contributor
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:47 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Have thanks: 1 time

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby sss20 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:48 am

*added poll ... Please vote.
sss20
Master Contributor
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:43 am
Has thanked: 132 times
Have thanks: 151 times
OS: Windows 7 Professional
Architecture: 64bit

Re: Opera vs. Chrome and Mozilla

Postby VampireTooth » Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:31 pm

I will always be a Firefox fan. The security and reliability is there. Sure it takes a little while to start up on a single core processor but... Once she get's going she flies through websites. Anything that can load up a webpage faster than I can sip on my coffee is fast enough. If one browser, say chrome or opera, is 0.02 or 0.03 of a second faster than Firefox then it doesn't justify switching over having to transfer my bookmarks and then try to find my extensions for chrome.

I singled out Chrome on that last part because.... well let's face it.. .adding adblock to opera is just too much of a PITA. Let's not forget Adblock on Chrome won't let you watch youtube videos. It makes you turn the adblocker off which allows the commercials through. Adblock for firefox doesn't have this draw back.

Another note: After typing all this on my laptop keyboard I came to the conclusion that I like my laptop's keyboard for typing more than I like my Razer Lycosa for typing.
VampireTooth
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:28 pm
Location: Kill-een
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 4 times
OS: Windows 7 Professional
Architecture: 64bit

PreviousNext

Return to A vs B

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron