<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Comodo Internet Security Review 3.5</title> <atom:link href="http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/</link> <description>Antivirus Reviews For 2011 / 2012, Tools and How To&#039;s</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: extent</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-3811</link> <dc:creator>extent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:01:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-3811</guid> <description>from most antivirus websites Comodo fared at the bottom of the barrel for detecting viruses, but how much better is it now? Its firewall has always been a winner, and i suppose any free antivirus is better than nothing.. but i would like to hear some more present opinions as to whether it has improved or is good enough for the average user that does not download very often, as an example? ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from most antivirus websites Comodo fared at the bottom of the barrel for detecting viruses, but how much better is it now? Its firewall has always been a winner, and i suppose any free antivirus is better than nothing.. but i would like to hear some more present opinions as to whether it has improved or is good enough for the average user that does not download very often, as an example? &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: snegoviksukablyat</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-3652</link> <dc:creator>snegoviksukablyat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:18:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-3652</guid> <description>hello
im new on this forum....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello<br
/> im new on this forum&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: joey</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1998</link> <dc:creator>joey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:20:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1998</guid> <description>Actually, Comodo does work with 64-bit.  I&#039;m running it right now and it works great!  I installed the prog on a computer that was infected with some nasty viruses and it cleaned it up like a charm!  I highly recommend Comodo Security Suite.  It&#039;s a great program to install for anyone looking to save money yet maintain security.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Comodo does work with 64-bit.  I&#8217;m running it right now and it works great!  I installed the prog on a computer that was infected with some nasty viruses and it cleaned it up like a charm!  I highly recommend Comodo Security Suite.  It&#8217;s a great program to install for anyone looking to save money yet maintain security.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HH</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1955</link> <dc:creator>HH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1955</guid> <description>Comodo doesn&#039;t work with Vista 64 bit. If you are running Kaspersky AV, then running the Defense+ and Firewall is a good addition. If you are running KIS, then no, because KIS already has a HIPS built in.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comodo doesn&#8217;t work with Vista 64 bit. If you are running Kaspersky AV, then running the Defense+ and Firewall is a good addition. If you are running KIS, then no, because KIS already has a HIPS built in.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rolo</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1942</link> <dc:creator>rolo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:43:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1942</guid> <description>hey ya,, hmm uh will commodo work with vista 64 bit?
and if im running kaspersky should i run commodo also?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey ya,, hmm uh will commodo work with vista 64 bit?<br
/> and if im running kaspersky should i run commodo also?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: josh</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1693</link> <dc:creator>josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:44:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1693</guid> <description>Yes the protection from system and application modification and the ability to kill process and block them in realtime was what made me use this application.
Those benefits can easily be used along side a seperte antivirus</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the protection from system and application modification and the ability to kill process and block them in realtime was what made me use this application.<br
/> Those benefits can easily be used along side a seperte antivirus</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: f</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1418</link> <dc:creator>f</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:04:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1418</guid> <description>@HH
the av component is still relitivly weak, but this time he went manual</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HH<br
/> the av component is still relitivly weak, but this time he went manual</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HH</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1415</link> <dc:creator>HH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:03:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1415</guid> <description>I am really confused, since PCMag has only rated CIS as &quot;fair.&quot; In fact, the reviewer thought the AV component was bad. Is the AV component better than Avira, Avast, or AVG free versions? most people in the Comodo forum admit that the Comodo AV is still relatively weak...and so I am surprised by this review.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really confused, since PCMag has only rated CIS as &#8220;fair.&#8221; In fact, the reviewer thought the AV component was bad. Is the AV component better than Avira, Avast, or AVG free versions? most people in the Comodo forum admit that the Comodo AV is still relatively weak&#8230;and so I am surprised by this review.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Larry W. Lyles</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1208</link> <dc:creator>Larry W. Lyles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1208</guid> <description>In watching the video review for Comodo Internet Security suite 3.5, the video was not for this product. The video was actually for SUPER AntiSpyware Pro November Test 2 - Part 2.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In watching the video review for Comodo Internet Security suite 3.5, the video was not for this product. The video was actually for SUPER AntiSpyware Pro November Test 2 &#8211; Part 2.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel Rasmussen</title><link>http://remove-malware.com/uncategorized/comodo-internet-security-review-35/#comment-1102</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Rasmussen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:55:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://remove-malware.com/?p=547#comment-1102</guid> <description>I think SAS will do exellent! I have it myself. Paid only 29.95 for PRO +9.95 for a lifetime subscription. Thats a good deal! Looking forward to the review! I use GDATA IS 2009 and SAS PRO together and my machine works like a charm.I also have MBAm PRO and use the scanner sometimes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think SAS will do exellent! I have it myself. Paid only 29.95 for PRO +9.95 for a lifetime subscription. Thats a good deal! Looking forward to the review! I use GDATA IS 2009 and SAS PRO together and my machine works like a charm.</p><p>I also have MBAm PRO and use the scanner sometimes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 27/35 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 583/591 objects using disk: basic

Served from: remove-malware.com @ 2012-02-11 03:44:40 -->
